Metastability

20 October 2015

Metastablity by decomposition of the potential

The project (together with Georg Menz) considers as a prime example a Fokker-Planck equation in a multi-well potential and calculates the precise rate of convergence to equilibrium. The convergence to equilibrium is measures in variance and in relative entropy. We consider the following parabolic PDE

tϱt=εΔϱt+(ϱtH), \partial_t \varrho_t = \varepsilon \Delta \varrho_t + \nabla \cdot ( \varrho_t \nabla H ) ,

with invariant measure in Gibbs form μ(dx)=exp(H/ε)\mu(dx) = \exp(-H/\varepsilon) . Therewith, the generator is symmetric in L2(dμ)L^2(d\mu) . Therefor, it is convenient to consider the evolution of ft:=ϱt/μf_t := \varrho_t / \mu . Then, for this evolution the variance and relative entropy defined by

varμ(f)=(ffˉ)2dμandEntμ(f)=flogffˉdμ, \operatorname{var}_\mu(f) = \int (f - \bar f)^2 d\mu \quad\text{and}\quad \operatorname{Ent}_\mu(f) = \int f \log \frac{f}{\bar f} d\mu,

with fˉ:=fdμ\bar f := \int f d\mu , are decresing in time:

ddtvar(ft)=2f2dμandddtEnt(ft)=f2fdμ. \frac{d}{dt} \operatorname{var}(f_t) = - 2 \int |\nabla f|^2 d\mu \quad \text{and}\quad \frac{d}{dt} \operatorname{Ent}(f_t) = - \int \frac{|\nabla f|^2}{f} d\mu .

Exponential convergence to equilibrium is established by a simple Gronwall arguemnt, if one is able to connect the quantities on the right hand side back to the variance and relative entropy, respectively. The functional inequalities needed in this case are the Poincaré (PI( and the logarithmic Sobolev inequality

varμ(f)CPIf2dμandEntμ(f)CEntf2fdμ. \operatorname{var}_\mu(f) \leq C_{\mathrm{PI}} \int |\nabla f|^2 d\mu \quad \text{and} \quad \operatorname{Ent}_\mu(f) \leq C_{\mathrm{Ent}} \int \frac{|\nabla f|^2}{f} d \mu .

The main result in

proves asymptotic estimates in ε\varepsilon for the constants CPIC_{\mathrm{PI}} and CEntC_{\mathrm{Ent}} .

The main idea comes from the simple observation, that a sample path of the according SDE

dXt=H(Xt)dt+2εdBt, dX_t = - \nabla H(X_t) dt + \sqrt{2\varepsilon} d B_t ,

with BtB_t a standard Brownian motion in Rd\mathbb{R}^d . Then, a typical picture of a sufficiently long trajectories looks like:

Sample path of a SDE in a double well potential

Sample path of a SDE in a double well potential

The trajectory shows a scale separation and spends a long time inside the individual basins of attraction for the local minima of HH (wrt. deterministic gradient flow x˙t=H(xt)\dot x_t = -\nabla H(x_t) ) before doing a transition between the basins of attraction. The proof carries over this strategy by decomposing the measure μ\mu roughly along the basin of attractions denoted by Ωi\Omega_i with i=1,,Mi=1,\dots , M the number of local minima. Then μ\mu has the mixture representation

μ=Z1μ1++ZMμM, \mu = Z_1 \mu_1 + \dots + Z_M \mu_M ,

where μi\mu_i are the conditional probability measures with support in Ωi\Omega_i and Zi=μ(Ωi)Z_i = \mu(\Omega_i) . This decomposition carries over to a splitting of the variance and entropy as follows:

varμ(f)=i=1MZivarμi(f)+12i,j=1MZiZj(fdμifdμj)2 \operatorname{var}_\mu(f) = \sum_{i=1}^M Z_i \operatorname{var}_{\mu_i}(f) + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i,j=1}^M Z_i Z_j \left( \int f d \mu_i - \int f d\mu_j \right)^2

and likewise for the entropy.

The local variances and entropies are estimated by constructing a Lyapunov function for the dynamics. For a background on the Lyapunov technique see (Patrick Cattiaux, Arnaud Guillin. Functional Inequalities via Lyapunov conditions. IF_ETE. 2010. <hal-00446104v2>). We slightly generalized the technique to cope with bounded domains by demanding appropriate Neumann boundary conditions for the Lyapunov function. Moreover, we succeeded also to construct a Lyapunov function, which made a fine analysis arond saddle points necessary.

The other part in the variance invoving the term (fdμifdμj)2\left( \int f d \mu_i - \int f d\mu_j \right)^2 was estimated using a Benamou-Brenier representation of the H1(dμ)H^{-1}(d\mu) , which we called a weighted transport distance. This cost representation allowed to construct a sufficiently flow of pushforwards connecting μi\mu_i and μj\mu_j .

Metastability in discrete setting

This ongoging project (with Martin Slowik) considers the discrete counterpart of the above dynamic, i.e. Markov chain on a discrete state space SS written with stochastic generator as

(Lf)(x):=ySp(x,y)(f(y)f(x)). (Lf)(x) := \sum_{y\in S} p(x,y) (f(y) - f(x)) .

We assume the existence of a reversible invariant measure μ\mu such that the detailed balance condition μ(x)p(x,y)=μ(y)p(y,x)\mu(x) p(x,y) = \mu(y) p(y,x) holds. The crucial idea from the continuous case to decompose the potential along the basin of attractions does not translate immediatley, since there is no canonical deterministic dyanmic associated with the generator LL , i.e. the role of ε\varepsilon is hidden inside.

We characterize metastability following the potential theoretic approach (see A. Bovier and F. den Hollander: Metastability – a potential theoretic approch) as follows: The Markov process {X(t)}\{ X(t) \} with generator LL is ϱ\varrho -metastable with respect to metastable points MM , if

maxmMPm(τMm<τm)minASMPμA(τM<τA)ϱ1, \frac{ \max_{m\in M} \mathbb{P}_m(\tau_{M\setminus m} < \tau_m) }{\min_{A\subset S \setminus M} \mathbb{P}_{\mu_A}(\tau_M < \tau_A )} \leq \varrho \ll 1 ,

where μA\mu_A is the conditial measure on AA . Hereby, for a set ASA \subset S , τA\tau_A is the first hitting time if X0∉AX_0 \not\in A and else the first return time to AA .

For a metastable Markov chain, one can associate to each metastable point mMm\in M its stochastic valleys in terms of hitting probabilities: The point xx belongs to the valley of mm if among the hitting probabilities to start in xx and to hit any m~M\tilde m \in M the largest one is attained for mm . This allows to carry over the decomposition idea from continuous state spaces.

Moreover, the above stochastic definition has an analytic connection via capacities by the identity

cap(A,B)=μ(A)PμA(τB<τA). \operatorname{cap}(A,B) = \mu(A) \mathbb{P}_{\mu_A}( \tau_B < \tau_A ) .

The main question of the project was to show in generality that the above definition without any further model assumptions on the rates is already enough to prove Poincaré and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities with error bounds depending only on ϱ\varrho and maybe on the cardinality of MM .

The program succeeded with the help of a robust capacitary inequality, which was established for Sobolev spaces by Vladimir Maz’ya (see V. Maz’ya. Sobolev Spaces: with Applications to Elliptic Partial Differential Equations and references therein for the history). We translated the inequality to discrete state spaces, where it reads:

Capacitary inequality

For f:RSf: \mathbb{R} \to S define by AtSA_t \subset S its super-level sets At:={f>t}A_t := \{ |f| > t\} . Moreove, assume that fB0f|_B \equiv 0 , then it holds

02tcap(At,B)dt4E(f), \int_0^\infty 2 t \operatorname{cap}(A_t , B) dt \leq 4 \mathcal{E}(f) ,

where E(f):=f,(Lf)μ\mathcal{E}(f) := \langle f , (-Lf) \rangle_\mu is the Dirichlet-form associated to the generator LL .

Exploiting the consequences of the above inequality allows to conclude estimates of CPIC_{\mathrm{PI}} and CLSIC_{\mathrm{LSI}} in terms of capacities with error bounds of the form 1+O(ϱM)1+O(\sqrt{\varrho | M|}) . For furhter details see the proceedings and article: